🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: gmane.linux.kernel
Article #307832

Re: mmap (2) vs read (2)

#307832
From: "Linh Dang"
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 12:47
32 lines
1211 bytes
Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 2005-09-17 at 12:10 -0400, Linh Dang wrote:
>> Hi, how come reading memory from /dev/mem using pread(2) or mmap(2)
>> will give diffent results?
>
> because you're being evil ;)
>
> mmap of /dev/mem for *ram* is special. To avoid cache aliases and
> other evils, you can only mmap non-ram realistically on /dev/mem.
>
> Why are you using /dev/mem in the first place, it's a sure sign that
> you're doing something really wrong in your design...

Thanx for the reply, what I'm doing is writing a driver (based on
mem.c) to export a block of ram to (other masters on) the PCI bus. The
driver does:

        1. get a contiguous block of ram using alloc_pages()
        2. export (via host-bridge hw setting) the block to the pci
           bus
        3. provide the .mmap() method in the driver to let userspace
           to mmap the device

In doing so, I encountered the inconsistencies of mmap(2) vs
read(2)/write(2). The work around I found is to SetPageReserved() on
all the pages got from alloc_pages(). But unfortunately I have no
clues why it's so. The vm code is not the easiest one to read
(compared to let's say the network code.)

--
Linh Dang

Message-ID: <wn5oe6q9vbf.fsf@linhd-2.ca.nortel.com>
Path: gmane.pugleaf.net!archive.newsdeef.eu!archive!g.newsdeef.eu!gmane.newsdeef.eu!news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
References: <wn58xxvhdz8.fsf@linhd-2.ca.nortel.com> <1126981595.3010.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>