Article View: gmane.linux.kernel
Article #307832Re: mmap (2) vs read (2)
From: "Linh Dang"
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 12:47
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 12:47
32 lines
1211 bytes
1211 bytes
Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com> wrote: > On Sat, 2005-09-17 at 12:10 -0400, Linh Dang wrote: >> Hi, how come reading memory from /dev/mem using pread(2) or mmap(2) >> will give diffent results? > > because you're being evil ;) > > mmap of /dev/mem for *ram* is special. To avoid cache aliases and > other evils, you can only mmap non-ram realistically on /dev/mem. > > Why are you using /dev/mem in the first place, it's a sure sign that > you're doing something really wrong in your design... Thanx for the reply, what I'm doing is writing a driver (based on mem.c) to export a block of ram to (other masters on) the PCI bus. The driver does: 1. get a contiguous block of ram using alloc_pages() 2. export (via host-bridge hw setting) the block to the pci bus 3. provide the .mmap() method in the driver to let userspace to mmap the device In doing so, I encountered the inconsistencies of mmap(2) vs read(2)/write(2). The work around I found is to SetPageReserved() on all the pages got from alloc_pages(). But unfortunately I have no clues why it's so. The vm code is not the easiest one to read (compared to let's say the network code.) -- Linh Dang
Message-ID:
<wn5oe6q9vbf.fsf@linhd-2.ca.nortel.com>
Path:
gmane.pugleaf.net!archive.newsdeef.eu!archive!g.newsdeef.eu!gmane.newsdeef.eu!news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
References:
<wn58xxvhdz8.fsf@linhd-2.ca.nortel.com> <1126981595.3010.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>